A promessa ou possibilidade de passar a existir uma cultura médica de vida saudável na América Latina

Os desafios enfrentados por pacientes e suas famílias para terem acesso a cuidados médicos referentes a condições de saúde crônicas fazem com que os profissionais de saúde responsáveis por seu atendimento médico se sintam, com elevada frequência, impotentes. Às vezes convém atribuir a reponsabilidade por esses desafios a um ou mais grupos específicos, tais como os formuladores de políticas ou o sistema de seguro-saúde. No entanto, as verdadeiras razões desses desafios são bem mais complexas, existindo múltiplos fatores presentes, com interrelação. Torna-se necessário realizar uma análise sistêmica mais ampla, bem como ter uma visão mais abrangente, de forma a integrar o contexto sociocultural, focando particularmente as populações vulneráveis e aquelas precariamente atendidas, incluindo-se os adultos mais idosos, a população de áreas densamente povoadas e os indivíduos com status socioeconômico de nível inferior, assim como os migrantes e as minorias1. Neste contexto, a equidade e a justiça social constituem fundamentos aplicáveis essencialmente em um estado de utopia, mas estes fundamentos são indispensáveis à implementação de mudanças futuras.A justiça social constitui um apelo bastante significativo como conceito, a ser plenamente reconhecido em todas as profissões relacionadas aos cuidados de saúde2. O conceito afirma que todos devem, independentemente das circunstâncias legais, políticas, econômicas ou outras3, ter acesso igual à riqueza, ao bem-estar, aos privilégios e às oportunidades, bem como à saúde. Além disso, esse conceito é dirigido para dimensões que vão além dos princípios do direito civil ou penal e transcendem, entre os indivíduos e a sociedade, a relação cujo propósito é ter e manter uma vida gratificante. Portanto, a justiça social é de aplicação universal, devendo ser relacionada a propósitos sociais em todas as regiões do mundo.Como região, a América Latina tem muitos países e com numerosos pontos em comum. Antes da pandemia do coronavírus de 2019 (COVID-19), existiam desafios significativos com relação à saúde na América Latina, incluindo a escassez de medicamentos, a falta de acesso a alimentos saudáveis ou a cuidados primários, seja para migrantes ou pessoas desabrigadas. De acordo com o Índice de GINI, a América Latina é a região mais injusta do planeta, com 185 milhões de pessoas auferindo uma renda abaixo do limiar de pobreza, o equivalente a 66 milhões de indivíduos em estado de pobreza extrema4. Para superar essas deficiências, as comunidades precariamente atendidas se apoiam mutuamente, trabalhando em projetos locais, bancos de alimentos e organizações religiosas, mas desafios significativos continuam existindo.A abordagem atual, com respeito aos cuidados de saúde para indivíduos fragilmente representados e que vivem em comunidades mal atendidas, não é mais sustentável. O caminho a adotar deve incluir como base a medicina para uma vida saudável (HLM, na sigla em inglês), promovendo em sua essência atividades físicas, boa alimentação, ter um peso corporal mediano e abster-se de fumar. Em nível sistêmico, essa mudança cultural diz respeito ao estabelecimento de políticas e práticas.Apromessa ou possibilidade de ter uma existência gratificante encontra-se aqui, na América Latina. Essa abordagem precisa abraçar o conceito de justiça social para que todos tenham oportunidades semelhantes com relação a ter um estilo de vida saudável, minimizando-se os efeitos deletérios das doenças crônicas.Alternate :The challenges that patients and their families experience to access care for chronic health conditions often make the health professionals responsible for their care feel powerless. At times, it may be convenient to lay the blame for these challenges on a singular group, such as policymakers or the health insurance system. However, the true reasons such challenges exist are much more complex, multifactorial, and interrelated. A broader systemic analysis and broader visio is needed to integrate the sociocultural context and place a particular focus on vulnerable, underserved populations, including older adults, people living in densely populated areas, people with lower socioeconomic status, migrants, and minorities11 Shadmi E, Chen Y, Dourado I, Faran-Perach I, Furler J, Hangoma P, Hanvoravongchai P, Obando C, Petrosyan V, Rao KD, Ruano AL, Shi L, de Souza LE, Spitzer-Shohat S, Sturgiss E, Suphanchaimat R, Uribe MV, Willems S. Health equity and COVID-19: global perspectives. Int J Equity Health 2020;19(1):104.. In this context, equity and social justice are constructs that may only feasible in a Utopia but are essential to effect change moving forward.Social justice as a concept is quite appealing and should be fully embraced by all health care professions22 Arena R, Laddu D, Severin R, Hall G, Bond S, HL-PIVOT Network. Healthy living and social justice: addressing the current syndemic in underserved communities. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2021;41(3):E5-E6.. The concept professes that all people should have equal access to wealth, well-being, privilege, opportunity, and health regardless of legal, political, economic, or other circumstances33 Braveman PA, Kumanyika S, Fielding J, Laveist T, Borrell LN., Manderscheid R, Troutman A. Health disparities and health equity: the issue is justice. Am J Public Health 2011, 101(Suppl. 1):S149-S155.. Moreover, this concept focuses on dimensions beyond civil or criminal law principles and the relationship between individuals and society to lead fulfilling lives. Therefore, social justice is relatable and universal for all regions in the world.Latin America as a region hosts many countries that share numerous commonalities. Prior to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there were significant health related challenges in Latin America, including prescription drug shortages, lack of access to healthy food or primary care for migrants, and homelessness. According to the GINI Index, Latin America is the most inequitable region globally;185 million people's income is below the poverty threshold, of whom 66 million live in extreme poverty44 Garcia PJ, Alarcón A, Bayer A, Buss P, Guerra G, Ribeiro H, Rojas K, Saenz R, Salgado de Snyder N, Solimano G, Torres R, Tobar S, Tuesca R, Vargas G, Atun R. COVID-19 response in Latin America. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2020;103(5): 1765.. While these underserved communities support each other to supplement these shortcomings by working with local movements, food banks, and religious organizations, significant challenges remain. The current approach to health care in underrepresented individuals who live in underserved communities is no longer sustainable. The way forward must include healthy living medicine (HLM) as a foundation, at its core promoting physical activity, good nutrition, average body weight, and not smoking. On a systemic level, this cultural change refers to the establishment of policies and practices. The promise or possibility of being is here in Latin America. This approach needs to embrace the concept of social justice so that all individuals in the population have similar opportunities to embrace a healthy lifestyle and minimize the deleterious effects of chronic disease.

A united approach to promoting healthy living behaviours and associated health outcomes: a global call for policymakers and decisionmakers.

Chronic disease pandemics have challenged societies and public health throughout history and remain ever-present. Despite increased knowledge, awareness and advancements in medicine, technology, and global initiatives the state of global health is declining. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has compounded the current perilous state of global health, and the long-term impact is yet to be realised. A coordinated global infrastructure could add substantial benefits to public health and yield prominent and consistent policy resulting in impactful change. To achieve global impact, research priorities that address multi-disciplinary social, environmental, and clinical must be supported by unified approaches that maximise public health. We present a call to action for established public health organisations and governments globally to consider the lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic and unite with true collaborative efforts to address current, longstanding, and growing challenges to public health.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiovascular health behaviors and risk factors: A new troubling normal that may be here to stay.

In March 2020, the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak was officially declared a global pandemic, leading to closure of public facilities, enforced social distancing and stay-at-home mandates to limit exposures and reduce transmission rates. While the severity of this "lockdown" period varied by country, the disruptions of the pandemic on multiple facets of life (e.g., daily activities, education, the workplace) as well as the social, economic, and healthcare systems impacts were unprecedented. These disruptions and impacts are having a profound negative effect on multiple facets of behavioral health and psychosocial wellbeing that are inextricably linked to cardiometabolic health and associated with adverse outcomes of COVID-19. For example, adoption of various cardiometabolic risk behavior behaviors observed during the pandemic contributed to irretractable trends in weight gain and poor mental health, raising concerns on the possible long-term consequences of the pandemic on cardiometabolic disease risk, and vulnerabilities to future viral pandemics. The purpose of this review is to summarize the direct and indirect effects of the pandemic on cardiometabolic health risk behaviors, particularly related to poor diet quality, physical inactivity and sedentary behaviors, smoking, sleep patterns and mental health. Additional insights into how the pandemic has amplified cardiovascular risk behaviors, particularly in our most vulnerable populations, and the potential implications for the future if these modifiable risk behaviors do not become better controlled, are described.

Systems science approaches to cardiovascular disease prevention and management in the era of COVID-19: A Humpty-Dumpty dilemma?

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic necessitated the implementation and prioritizing of strict public health strategies to mitigate COVID-19 transmission and infection over all else. As we enter a 'recovery' phase in which the impact of the virus recedes (but does not relent), we ask, "How do we develop a game plan that considers prevention over management of public health threats of a more chronic nature, including cardiovascular disease?" We frame this choice point as a "Humpty-Dumpty" moment for public health with enduring and potentially irreversible consequences. Citing clear examples of other public health successes and failures, we outline in detail how sustaining cardiovascular population health under complex post-pandemic conditions will necessitate decision-making to be informed with a systems science approach, in which interventions, goals, outcomes and features of complex systems are carefully aligned.

The Impact of COVID-19 on the Social Determinants of Cardiovascular Health.

Cardiovascular disease is the leading noncommunicable disease and cause of premature mortality globally. Despite well established evidence of a cause-effect relationship between modifiable lifestyle behaviours and the onset of risk of chronic disease, preventive approaches to curtail increasing prevalence have been ineffective. This has undoubtedly been exacerbated by the response to COVID-19, which saw widespread national lockdowns implemented to reduce transmission and alleviate pressure on strained health care systems. A consequence of these approaches was a well documented negative impact on population health in the context of both physical and mental well-being. Although the true extent of the impact of the COVID-19 response on global health has yet to be fully realised or understood, it seems prudent to review effective preventative and management strategies that have yielded positive outcomes across the spectrum (ie, from individual to society). There is also a clear need to heed lessons learned from the COVID-19 experience in the power of collaboration and how this can be used in the design, development, and implementation of future approaches to address the longstanding burden of cardiovascular disease.

COVID-19 and elite sport: Cardiovascular implications and return-to-play.

Curtailing elite sports during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic was necessary to prevent widespread viral transmission. Now that elite sport and international competitions have been largely restored, there is still a need to devise appropriate screening and management pathways for athletes with a history of, or current, COVID-19 infection. These approaches should support the decision-making process of coaches, sports medicine practitioners and the athlete about the suitability to return to training and competition activities. In the absence of longitudinal data sets from athlete populations, the incidence of developing prolonged and debilitating symptoms (i.e., Long COVID) that affects a return to training and competition remains a challenge to sports and exercise scientists, sports medicine practitioners and clinical groups. As the world attempts to adjust toward 'living with COVID-19' the very nature of elite and international sporting competition poses a risk to athlete welfare that must be screened for and managed with bespoke protocols that consider the cardiovascular implications for performance.

Cardiorespiratory fitness as a vital sign of CVD risk in the COVID-19 era.

The severe health consequences of the corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic have been exacerbated by the prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, such as physical inactivity, obesity, hypertension, and diabetes. Further, policy decisions during the pandemic augmented unhealthy lifestyle behaviors and health inequalities, likely increasing the global disease burden. Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is a well-established biomarker associated with CVD risk. Emerging data demonstrate that high CRF offers some protection against severe outcomes from COVID-19 infection, highlighting the importance of CRF for population health and the potential for limiting the severity of future pandemics. CRF is best assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), which will be an important tool for understanding the prolonged pathophysiology of COVID-19, the emergence of long-COVID, and the lasting effects of COVID-19 on CVD risk. Utilization of CRF and CPET within clinical settings should become commonplace because of lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic.

The response to the COVID-19 pandemic: With hindsight what lessons can we learn?

The purpose of this paper is to put forward some evidence-based lessons that can be learned from how to respond to a Pandemic that relate to healthy living behaviours (HLB). A 4-step methodology was followed to conduct a narrative review of the literature and to present a professional practice vignette. The narrative review identified 8 lessons: 1) peer review; 2) historical perspectives; 3) investing in resilience and protection; 4) unintended consequences; 5) protecting physical activity; 6) school closures; 7) mental health; and 8) obesity. As in all probability there will be another Pandemic, it is important that the lessons learned over the last three years in relation to HLB are acted upon. Whilst there will not always be a consensus on what to emphasise, it is important that many evidence-based positions are presented. The authors of this paper recognise that this work is a starting point and that the lessons presented here will need to be revisited as new evidence becomes available.

Cardiovascular disease prevention and management in the COVID-19 era and beyond: An international perspective.

Despite some indicators of a localized curtailing of cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevalence, CVD remains one of the largest contributors to global morbidity and mortality. While the magnitude and impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic have yet to be realized in its entirety, an unquestionable impact on global health and well-being is already clear. At a time when the global state of CVD is perilous, we provide a continental overview of prevalence data and initiatives that have positively influenced CVD outcomes. What is clear is that despite attempts to address the global burden of CVD, there remains a lack of collective thinking and approaches. Moving forward, a coordinated global infrastructure that, if developed with appropriate and relevant key stakeholders, could provide significant and longstanding benefits to public health and yield prominent and consistent policy resulting in impactful change. To achieve global impact, research priorities that address multi-disciplinary social, environmental, and clinical perspectives must be underpinned by unified approaches that maximize public health.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiovascular health behaviors and risk factors: A new troubling normal that may be here to stay

In March 2020, the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak was officially declared a global pandemic, leading to closure of public facilities, enforced social distancing and stay-at-home mandates to limit exposures and reduce transmission rates. While the severity of this “lockdown” period varied by country, the disruptions of the pandemic on multiple facets of life (e.g., daily activities, education, the workplace) as well as the social, economic, and healthcare systems impacts were unprecedented. These disruptions and impacts are having a profound negative effect on multiple facets of behavioral health and psychosocial wellbeing that are inextricably linked to cardiometabolic health and associated with adverse outcomes of COVID-19. For example, adoption of various cardiometabolic risk behavior behaviors observed during the pandemic contributed to irretractable trends in weight gain and poor mental health, raising concerns on the possible long-term consequences of the pandemic on cardiometabolic disease risk, and vulnerabilities to future viral pandemics. The purpose of this review is to summarize the direct and indirect effects of the pandemic on cardiometabolic health risk behaviors, particularly related to poor diet quality, physical inactivity and sedentary behaviors, smoking, sleep patterns and mental health. Additional insights into how the pandemic has amplified cardiovascular risk behaviors, particularly in our most vulnerable populations, and the potential implications for the future if these modifiable risk behaviors do not become better controlled, are described.

The effects of COVID-19 on respiratory muscle performance: making the case for respiratory muscle testing and training.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection results in multiorgan damage primarily mediated by viral infiltration via angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 receptors on the surface of cells. A primary symptom for many patients is exertional dyspnoea which may persist even beyond recovery from the viral infection. Respiratory muscle (RM) performance was hypothesised as a contributing factor to the severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) symptoms, such as dyspnoea, and outcomes. This was attributed to similarities between patient populations at elevated risk for severe COVID-19 symptoms and those with a greater likelihood of baseline RM weakness and the effects of prolonged mechanical ventilation. More recent evidence suggests that SARS-CoV-2 infection itself may cause damage to the RM, and many patients who have recovered report persistent dyspnoea despite having mild cases, normal lung function or undamaged lung parenchyma. These more recent findings suggest that the role of RM in the persistent dyspnoea due to COVID-19 may be more substantial than originally hypothesised. Therefore, screening for RM weakness and providing interventions to improve RM performance appears to be important for patients with COVID-19. This article will review the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on RM performance and provide clinical recommendations for screening RM performance and treatment interventions.

Mapping One Million COVID-19 Deaths and Unhealthy Lifestyle Behaviors in the United States: Recognizing the Syndemic Pattern and Taking Action.

Tragically, the United States (US) surpassed one million documented deaths due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. A convincing association between unhealthy lifestyle behaviors and poorer outcomes associated with COVID-19 infection has already been demonstrated and communicated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in public health messaging. The US is experiencing not a pandemic, but a syndemic, specifically an unhealthy lifestyle behaviors-chronic diseases-COVID-19 syndemic. This syndemic has almost certainly significantly contributed to the more than one million deaths the United States has experienced during the pandemic. Decades of a high prevalence of unhealthy lifestyle behaviors laid the foundation for our current unfortunate situation by increasing vulnerability to a novel virus, especially among subgroups who have been historically marginalized. As such, a major pathway to defeating this syndemic is through the promotion of healthy living behaviors for all. Now is the time for action appropriate to meet the demands of a syndemic and a new path forward to a healthier and more equitable future.